<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How To Build A Cable TV DeScrambler</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.blogmond.com/2007/12/04/how-to-build-a-cable-tv-descrambler/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.blogmond.com/2007/12/04/how-to-build-a-cable-tv-descrambler/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 20:44:25 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: internet ready lcd tv</title>
		<link>http://www.blogmond.com/2007/12/04/how-to-build-a-cable-tv-descrambler/comment-page-1/#comment-410714</link>
		<dc:creator>internet ready lcd tv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Jul 2011 12:18:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogmond.com/2007/12/04/how-to-build-a-cable-tv-descrambler/#comment-410714</guid>
		<description>Thanks for taking the time to discuss that, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If doable, while you gain know-how, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely helpful for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for taking the time to discuss that, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If doable, while you gain know-how, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely helpful for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: megavnn</title>
		<link>http://www.blogmond.com/2007/12/04/how-to-build-a-cable-tv-descrambler/comment-page-1/#comment-376941</link>
		<dc:creator>megavnn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Jan 2011 11:00:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogmond.com/2007/12/04/how-to-build-a-cable-tv-descrambler/#comment-376941</guid>
		<description>This is actually the right blog for anybody who wants to check out this topic. You realize much its almost difficult to argue together with you (not too I actually would want…HaHa). You certainly put a fresh spin on the topic thats been discussing for many years. Great stuff, just great!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is actually the right blog for anybody who wants to check out this topic. You realize much its almost difficult to argue together with you (not too I actually would want…HaHa). You certainly put a fresh spin on the topic thats been discussing for many years. Great stuff, just great!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hec</title>
		<link>http://www.blogmond.com/2007/12/04/how-to-build-a-cable-tv-descrambler/comment-page-1/#comment-355285</link>
		<dc:creator>hec</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 21:55:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogmond.com/2007/12/04/how-to-build-a-cable-tv-descrambler/#comment-355285</guid>
		<description>What's you guys aren't understanding is that the cable line has to be active for this to work. Ppl who live in let's say single fam homes or duplexes, are disconnected from the network physically at the line outside the home. But if you live in a complex that's cable ready, usually there is just a scramble block to keep you from getting basic channels till you subscribe as it would not be cost effective to connect and disconnect physical lines in complex with hundreds and hundreds of units. So if you hook up to your wall at home and get absolutely nothing but static, then no it won't work, but if you hook up and see scrambled and/or blurry images, then it might be worth a try! And the DSL filters works due to pure accident that it just so happens to eliminate the digital freq used to scramble and leaves the analog to come through (exactly what you need for basic cable)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s you guys aren&#8217;t understanding is that the cable line has to be active for this to work. Ppl who live in let&#8217;s say single fam homes or duplexes, are disconnected from the network physically at the line outside the home. But if you live in a complex that&#8217;s cable ready, usually there is just a scramble block to keep you from getting basic channels till you subscribe as it would not be cost effective to connect and disconnect physical lines in complex with hundreds and hundreds of units. So if you hook up to your wall at home and get absolutely nothing but static, then no it won&#8217;t work, but if you hook up and see scrambled and/or blurry images, then it might be worth a try! And the DSL filters works due to pure accident that it just so happens to eliminate the digital freq used to scramble and leaves the analog to come through (exactly what you need for basic cable)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Selinsky</title>
		<link>http://www.blogmond.com/2007/12/04/how-to-build-a-cable-tv-descrambler/comment-page-1/#comment-343790</link>
		<dc:creator>James Selinsky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Jul 2010 17:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogmond.com/2007/12/04/how-to-build-a-cable-tv-descrambler/#comment-343790</guid>
		<description>The  dsl filter was designed for a specific purpose. To block a digital signal and allow an analog one to  pass through.
This type of filter could work if your trying to remove a digital signal while leaving an analog one intact.
Since The majority of us Want the digital signal this filter would do the  OPPOSITE of what you are claiming.
I'm not going to build one.. because I already know what it does.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The  dsl filter was designed for a specific purpose. To block a digital signal and allow an analog one to  pass through.<br />
This type of filter could work if your trying to remove a digital signal while leaving an analog one intact.<br />
Since The majority of us Want the digital signal this filter would do the  OPPOSITE of what you are claiming.<br />
I&#8217;m not going to build one.. because I already know what it does.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ddavis0009</title>
		<link>http://www.blogmond.com/2007/12/04/how-to-build-a-cable-tv-descrambler/comment-page-1/#comment-339044</link>
		<dc:creator>Ddavis0009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jun 2010 03:14:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogmond.com/2007/12/04/how-to-build-a-cable-tv-descrambler/#comment-339044</guid>
		<description>This shit does NOT WORK.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This shit does NOT WORK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://www.blogmond.com/2007/12/04/how-to-build-a-cable-tv-descrambler/comment-page-1/#comment-309735</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 04:40:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.blogmond.com/2007/12/04/how-to-build-a-cable-tv-descrambler/#comment-309735</guid>
		<description>this shit dont work dont wast your time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this shit dont work dont wast your time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<html><body></body></html>
